Disagreement and Fragmentation in Growing Groups
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Cognitive dissonance in groups: the consequences of disagreement.
As L. Festinger (1957) argued, the social group is a source of cognitive dissonance as well as a vehicle for reducing it. That is, disagreement from others in a group generates dissonance, and subsequent movement toward group consensus reduces this negative tension. The authors conducted 3 studies to demonstrate group-induced dissonance. In the first, students in a group with others who ostensi...
متن کاملChurch-Rosser Groups and Growing Context-Sensitive Groups
A finitely generated group is called a Church-Rosser group (growing contextsensitive group) if it admits a finitely generated presentation for which the word problem is a Church-Rosser (growing context-sensitive) language. Although the ChurchRosser languages are incomparable to the context-free languages under set inclusion, they strictly contain the class of deterministic context-free language...
متن کاملGrowing forests in abelian p-groups
At the center of the theory of abelian p-groups are the classical theorems of Ulm, Zippin and Kaplansky, going back to the thirties, that classify countable p-groups by their Ulm invariants: the uniqueness theorem is referred to as Ulm's theorem, the existence theorem as Zippin's theorem. For each ordinal , the -th Ulm invariant of G can be de ned as the dimension fG( ) of the vector space (ove...
متن کاملGrowing trees in internet news groups and forums.
We present an empirical study of the networks created by users within internet news groups and forums and show that they organize themselves into scale-free trees. The structure of these trees depends on the topic under discussion; specialist topics have trees with a short shallow structure whereas more universal topics are discussed widely and have a deeper tree structure. For news groups we f...
متن کاملCommunication in Natural Resource Management: Agreement between and Disagreement within Stakeholder Groups
Communication among stakeholders is commonly held to improve agreement on facts and management goals. Results from statistical network analyses of six natural resource management systems indicate that the effects of communication depend on context. If communication affects stakeholder knowledge and values, it fosters agreement between stakeholder groups but it results in more disagreement withi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Science Research Network
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1556-5068']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4291555